Additional notes
Building Control will be consistent in enforcement approach by following the criteria and guidance set down in relevant legislation and codes of practice.
Building Control will always be objective to ensure that decisions are based on facts and evidence.
The 1991 guidance note stated the law relating to enforcement at the time, and in particular the time limits controlling prosecutions brought before Magistrates. The guidance is still valid now.
The cases of Hertsmere Borough Council –V– Alan Dunn Building Contractors Ltd [1986] LGR and Torridge District Council –V– Turner [1991] TLR, provide the law in respect to when a contravention has occurred and from when the enforcement clock begins. This is particularly necessary insofar as section 127 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 (c.43) is concerned, in that:
1. A magistrates’ court shall not try an information or hear a complaint unless the information was laid, or the complaint made, within 6 months from the time when the offence was committed, or the matter of compliance arose.
This rule is equally applicable to any prosecution or action being considered under other parts of the legislation that Building Control deals with, for example section 81 of the Building Act 1984 (Demolition).
Accordingly to pursue a financial penalty, under any section of the Acts – except section 35A of the Building Act (see below) – the action must be laid within 6 months from when the alleged offence occurred.
Where the solution is to remove a contravention then the specified time limit will also run from when the contravention occurred. As such, to remove a Building Regulation contravention, by way of the service of an enforcement notice by the application of section 36 of the Building Act, the 12-month time limit to take action will begin at the time the contravention occurred - not when the contravention was brought to Building Controls attention.
In the following examples (the list is not exhaustive) the date when the alleged offence was committed is easily definable:-
(a) Failure to deposit plans or a building notice – the 6 months time limit begins to run from the time the work commenced.
(b) Failure to provide a notice about certain stages of work – the 6 months time limit begins from the date that the notice should have been received and after the work involved has been carried out.
(c) Failure to provide a notice about the demolition of a building – the 6 months time limit begins from the date that the work commenced.
In other cases – except those to which section 35A of the Building Act 1984 applies – evidence must be laid, to begin proceedings, within 6 months of the work being completed.
The date of completion of the work can sometimes be difficult to determine, but if the Council is aware that contraventions have existed for more than 6 months, or there is sufficient doubt about how long the work has been underway, then prosecutions for a fine are unlikely to succeed.
It is also worth noting that case law directs that time limits for proceedings commence when a part of the building, which is in contravention, has been completed – not necessarily when all the work has been completed.
For example a staircase in an office block that is installed at too steep an angle. The staircase may be structurally complete before the rest of the building work; however, the alleged offence time limit begins at the time of the completion of the staircase – not upon the completion of all the building work.
The time limits mentioned above have been modified with respect to section 35 of the Building Act 1984, which was amended by section 13 of the Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Act 2006 and introduced section 35A – in particular:
(1) Despite anything in section 127(1) of the magistrates' courts act 1980 (c. 43), An information relating to a relevant offence may be tried by a magistrates' court if it is laid at any time.
(a) within the period of two years beginning with the day on which the offence was committed, and
(b) within the period of six months beginning with the relevant date.
(4) In subsection (1)(b) above, “the relevant date” means the date on which evidence sufficient to justify the proceedings comes to the knowledge of the person commencing the proceedings.
This amendment became effective on 21 August 2006. However, it was unable to be applied until a designating order was made to identify which regulations would be considered to be a relevant offence.
On 10 March 2008 amendment regulations (S.I. 2008/671) were made and then laid before Parliament on 13 March 2008. These amendments inserted a new regulation 22A into the Building Regulations which effectively designated regulations 4 and 6(e) – so far as Part L was concerned – and regulations 4A, 4B, 17C and 17D(f) to allow section 35A of the Building Act to be applied.
However, regulation 22A only came into force on 6 April 2008 and was not able to be applied retrospectively.
There was concern that the application of these longer time limits solely to energy performance contraventions was uneven and, following a consultation process, it was considered that similar time limits should be applied to all the regulations.
The mechanism for extending the prosecutions time limits, to all provisions of the Building Regulations, was provided for in the Housing and Regeneration Bill. This became law on 22 July 2008, with the publication of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 (c17) (H&RA08).
Within the H&RA08 section 317 amended section 35A of the Building Act to allow any contravention of Building Regulations to enjoy the same time limit freedoms as those introduced for energy conservation offences.
However, section 317 of the H&RA08 did not come into force automatically and was - by virtue of section 325 - to be introduced on such a day appointed by the Secretary of State.
On 9 September 2008, in a circular letter (CI/43/19/1) to all Building Control Bodies throughout England and Wales, the Secretary of State confirmed – thereby appointing – the date when section 317 of the H&RA08 was to come into force – this being 22 September 2008.
Again the application of section 317, and therefore section 35A, is not retrospective and can only be applied to any contraventions – including energy efficiency regulations covered by regulation 22A – that occurred on or after 22 September 2008.
To assist in understanding the impact of these, a time table was provided by government.
Date of offence under section 35 | Provisions to which section 35 applies breached | Time limit for bringing prosecution |
---|---|---|
Before 6 April 2008 | All provisions | Six months |
6 April 2008 to 21 September 2008 | Provisions designated by regulation 22A | Two years, subject to maximum of 6 months from date of obtaining sufficient evidence to bringing prosecution |
6 April 2008 to 21 September 2008 | Provisions designated by regulation 22A | Six months |
From 22 September 2008 | All provisions | Two years, subject to maximum of 6 months from date of obtaining sufficient evidence to bringing prosecution |
It should be noted that Regulation 22A is, by virtue of section 317 H&RA08 and section 35A BA84, unnecessary after 22 Sept 2010 - after which time all Building Regulation contraventions were able to be handled under section 35A BA84.
The use of section 36 notices should only be used where a serious contravention occurs and there is an intention that the Council intends for it to be removed.
Case law suggests that, having served a section 36 notice within the required 12-month time period, the Council has an infinite period of time in which to enforce the notice (Bello v London Borough of Lewisham [2003] EWCA Civ 353).
As such it was held that there was no time limit by which a Local Authority has to use its powers under section 36 of the Building Act 1984. In the case in question Lewisham Council enforced the removal of a contravention some 12-years after the service of the original notice.
As such the Council will, in all cases where it considers the contravention of Building Regulations to be justifiably serious enough to warrant the application of section 36, serve a notice on the owner of the building and have the details of the notice included on the Land Charges register for the property.
The Council will then make all reasonable attempts to require the owner to remove the contravention themselves.
Should powers of persuasion fail then the Council will remove work undertaken in default.
As a part of its normal routine, evidence will normally be gathered through the process of notified inspections for Building Regulations matters.
Where a matter is by way of complaint, surveyors will make all reasonable attempts to gain entry to a property to carry out an inspection by way of invitation by the owner/occupier. However, where the matter is considered to be serious or access is being unreasonably withheld, surveyors have the authority to enter premises at reasonable hours - unless the matter relates to a dangerous building and/or emergency measures are necessary outside normal working hours.
Failure to allow entry to an authorised surveyor will result in a warrant being obtained from a Magistrate and the warrant will be used and entry gained - by force if necessary.
Building Control surveyors carry photographic identification badges and warrant cards, which will be displayed on request.
Building Control will, in the application of gathering evidence and inspecting any allegation of an offence or dangerous and dilapidated building, have regard to and apply the principles set out in the Home Office publication: Code of Practice - Powers of Entry (December 2014).
All Building Control enforcement notices will, except notices in relation to actions carried out to deal with emergency measures for a dangerous building – by virtue of section 78 of the Building Act 1984, include information regarding rights of appeal and appropriate time limits to make any such appeal.
In most cases notices will be served on the owner as identified by reference to the most up-to-date records held by the Land Registry, or where an owner cannot be identified notices will be served by addressing them to – “The Owner(s) and/or Occupier(s)” and posted or affixed to the property in question.
Where the owner is a business, the notice will be addressed to the Company Secretary.
The council will, as far as it is reasonably practical to do so, make reasonable enquiries about the name and address of the owner and address any notice accordingly.
Notices will, in most cases, be delivered by surveyors to the owner’s address – where this is within the authority boundary. In some cases recorded or registered mail will be used.
Where notices etc. are delivered by hand these will be confirmed by reference to a certificate of service, signed by the surveyor concerned and, where possible, accompanied by a dated photograph of the place where the notice etc. was addressed to, e.g. house number and post/letter box.
Yes, charges may be made for actual disbursements incurred. Such as
- photocopying
- postage and packaging
- costs directly incurred as a result of viewing information
In addition, for any requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, any charges for staff time will be at £25 (any charges for VAT are in addition to this).
If a charge is made, we will let you know.
Confirmation of payment due and how to pay will be given before the information is provided. Payment may be requested prior to provision of the information.
A schedule of fees is published towards the end of our Budget Book under the heading Fees and Charges, Corporate and Business Services.
Our current photocopying charges are
- A4: 30 pence per page
- A3: 40 pence per page
You are entitled to say how you wish the information to be given to you.
This may be by letter, e-mail or by inspection at the Civic Centre on a date and time to be mutually agreed.
However it may not always be possible for us to comply with your wishes and supply it to you in your preferred format.
As an example, there may be times where a document contains some information suitable for release under the Act, but also some information covered by another Act or exemption that prevents us from giving it to you.
Therefore, inspection of the original document may not be possible. If that is the case, we will advise you of this.
Yes, repeated requests and/or applications made with the aim of frustrating the operations of the Council might be refused. We may also refuse to comply with a request for information where we estimate that the cost would exceed the cost ceiling set by the Fees Regulations.
We may also refuse to comply with the request where the information is considered to be exempt under the FOI Act.
Should this be the case then you will be given an explanation of the reasons for us refusing the request.
If you are not satisfied with this response you may, within 40 working days of receiving our reply, ask for an internal review.
If subsequently you are not satisfied with the Council's decision you may apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision.
Generally, the ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted the internal review procedure provided by the Council. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at the following address:
The Information Commissioner
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
SK9 5AS
We always look for ways to improve our website. Share your feedback on how we can improve the information or structure of this web page.
To get in touch about a service we provide, use our contact us form
Did you find this page useful?