Self-Assessment Mechanism
The statutory guidance further defines the Best Value themes by providing a detailed description of the theme, along with various positive features as ‘characteristics of a well-functioning authority’, contrasted with a list of example negative indicators of potential failures. There are 73 separate characteristics across the 7 themes described in the statutory guidance. The Council must respond to the NS-BVN in a pragmatic way to assure Central Government that RBC is a ‘well-functioning authority’. Therefore, one of the first workstreams in RBC’s NS-BVN response programme was identified as a self-assessment against the seven Best Value themes and each ‘characteristic of a well-functioning authority’. A robust systematic process was developed to assess and reflect on our current position against the Best Value Duty guidance.
Methodology
For each theme and characteristic, an initial narrative along with evidence to support the narrative was prepared by the workstream team based on general knowledge of the Council and services provided. This was then used in a series of workshops with relevant Corporate Heads of Service and subject matter experts from across the organisation depending on the requirement of the characteristic. In this way, the narrative was further developed and expanded, and the evidence library further populated. Once narratives were in final drafts, seven independent reviewers were identified, one for each theme, and were asked to review the narrative, sample the evidence and score the characteristic. A second level of assurance on the scoring was subsequently applied, with another officer reviewing all scoring across all characteristics to provide a consistency check of all the scores initial reviewers had given. The Corporate Leadership Team (CLT) then reviewed the scoring given and subsequently a ‘heat map’ was produced:was produced:
Self-Assessment Heatmaps keys
Scores | Heat Map Key |
---|---|
Dark Green | STRONG EVIDENCE to support a comprehensive narrative that leaves no doubt this aspect is met. No gaps identified. |
Light Green | EVIDENCE to support narrative but with gaps in evidence. Seek further evidence for this aspect. Actions to be implemented. |
Yellow | SOME EVIDENCE to support narrative provided but with gaps in narrative. Look to further enhance delivery in this aspect. Actions to be implemented. |
Amber | A narrative can be provided but this CANNOT BE EVIDENCED (perhaps because delivery is at an early stage and/or results are not being measured). |
Red | NO EVIDENCE OF SUCCESS. The organisation is not yet tackling this area and/or there are major obstacles to progress. |
Grey | Not in the control of Officers to influence this aspect. Politically driven. |
White | New element in updated Statutory Guidance. |
We always look for ways to improve our website. Share your feedback on how we can improve the information or structure of this web page.
To get in touch about a service we provide, use our contact us form
Did you find this page useful?